Content-level diffs, three-way merge, and blame stay in libgit2 rather than being reimplemented in SQL, since libgit2 already has that support and works against the Postgres backends through cgo bindings. The Forgejo fork would be “replace modules/git with libgit2 backed by Postgres” rather than “replace modules/git with raw SQL,” because the read-side queries only cover the simple cases and anything involving content comparison or graph algorithms still needs libgit2 doing the work with Postgres as its storage layer. That’s a meaningful dependency to carry, though libgit2 is well-maintained and already used in production by the Rust ecosystem and various GUI clients. SQL implementations of some of this using recursive CTEs would be interesting to try eventually but aren’t needed to get a working forge. The remaining missing piece is the server-side pack protocol: the remote helper covers the client side, but a Forgejo integration also needs a server that speaks upload-pack and receive-pack against Postgres, either through libgit2’s transport layer or a Go implementation that queries the objects table directly.
22:31, 2 марта 2026Мир
17:38, 9 марта 2026Бывший СССР。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
The journal_mode pragma returns a string which is the new journal mode.。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
Withings ScanWatch, Manual
第二百二十八条 两艘及以上船舶造成油污损害的，各船舶所有人应当对无法合理分开的损害承担连带责任。。关于这个话题，新收录的资料提供了深入分析